Remote viewing

Ikwipedia

Remote viewing

In 1972, at Stanford Research Institute in Menlo Park, Hal Puthoff and Russell Targ launched the first CIA-funded experiments in remote viewing (RV), a practice in which trained individuals purportedly perceive information about a distant or shielded target — a place, object, person, or event, sometimes across time — using psychic or psi faculties without ordinary sensory channels or prior knowledge of the target. The term was reportedly suggested by Ingo Swann in December 1971 during an experiment at the American Society for Psychical Research in New York City to distinguish the practice from the closely related concept of clairvoyance. Working with subjects including Swann and Pat Price, Puthoff and Targ produced experimental results the agency assessed as statistically significant and operationally useful. From 1978 onward the programme operated under successive classification designations — Gondola Wish, Grill Flame, Center Lane, Sunstreak, and finally Stargate — under DIA and INSCOM management, with trained military viewers including Joe McMoneagle applying RV to intelligence collection tasks. The programme was declassified and officially terminated in 1995 after a mixed assessment by the American Institutes for Research; remote viewing has remained central to both the history of psychic operations and to civilian research into consciousness and non-human intelligence.

Early background

In nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century occult and spiritualist literature, the phenomenon now called remote viewing was referred to as telesthesia or traveling clairvoyance and was described as "seeing remote or hidden objects clairvoyantly with the inner eye, or in alleged out-of-body travel." Experimental investigation of psychic phenomena by major scientists began in the mid-nineteenth century, with contributions from Michael Faraday, Alfred Russel Wallace, Rufus Osgood Mason, and William Crookes, whose work centred on focused tests of individuals thought to be psychically gifted. In the 1930s, J. B. Rhine extended the study of paranormal performance into larger unselected populations under standardised experimental protocols. By the 1960s, counterculture attitudes and the human potential movement renewed public interest in consciousness studies and psychic phenomena and made research funding more available. In the early 1970s Puthoff and Targ joined the Electronics and Bioengineering Laboratory at SRI and initiated studies of the paranormal, initially supported with private funding from the Parapsychology Foundation and the Institute of Noetic Sciences before CIA funding arrived.

SRI research program

The SRI programme was initiated after Puthoff, then conducting laser research at the institute, invited self-described psychic and artist Ingo Swann for informal experiments in consciousness physics. Swann's apparent ability to affect and accurately describe the interior of a multiply-shielded quantum chip caused the CIA to approach Puthoff, and an initial contract of roughly $50,000–60,000 launched what became a programme lasting over two decades. Working alongside physicist Russell Targ, Puthoff built the programme into a formal research operation using double-blind experimental designs: an experimenter would retrieve a sealed envelope from the lab director's safe, travel to a randomly chosen site, and the viewer at SRI would describe what they perceived at that location — without any contact with the outbound experimenter.

Pat Price, a former Burbank police commissioner who had used similar impressions in solving crimes, joined the programme and became one of its strongest early subjects. In 1974 Puthoff and Targ published their findings in Nature, including a study of Uri Geller under conditions of sensory shielding. Their results in the Proceedings of the IEEE followed in 1976, and Robert Jahn's PEAR Lab at Princeton University subsequently replicated the remote viewing results independently. A key finding was that remote viewing ability appeared broadly distributed across the population rather than restricted to gifted individuals — following a bell curve analogous to athletic or musical ability, with implications for trainability. Experiments placing viewers aboard submarines at depth established that the effect persisted through seawater, ruling out low-frequency electromagnetic transmission as the mechanism.

Protocols

The central methodological finding of the SRI program was that viewers produce better data through visceral and kinesthetic response than through deliberate visualization or imagination. The training procedure involved a multi-stage process of sketching and free-association without premature interpretation, progressively drilling through layers of the target until a coherent sense emerged.

Ingo Swann developed Coordinate Remote Viewing (CRV), also called Controlled Remote Viewing, a structured protocol in which the viewer is given only geographic coordinates and no other identifying information about the target. CRV became the standard training methodology for military viewers; the U.S. Army's official CRV training manual was co-authored by Paul Smith, who served in the programme from 1983.

Extended Remote Viewing (ERV) is a related approach in which the viewer enters a deeper hypnagogic state, often with a monitor present. Joe McMoneagle worked with Robert Monroe at the Monroe Institute in Nellysford, Virginia, on controlled out-of-body applications for intelligence collection, with the Department of the Army funding the sessions to assess whether intelligence could be gathered that way more precisely than through standard RV. Associative Remote Viewing (ARV) and Technical Remote Viewing (TRV) — the latter popularised by former Army viewer Edward Dames — are later derivations of the basic CRV protocol.

Military applications

Steven Greer has stated that CIA and Army intelligence programs utilized the Monroe Institute's Hemi-Sync technology as an ancillary tool for remote viewing training, with General Albert Stubblebine sending his personnel through the Institute's programs. Greer, who was personally acquainted with Ingo Swann, reported that Swann was "incredibly accurate" in targeting Soviet installations and objects in space, including identifying objects near Saturn that were later confirmed, but that Swann "regretted what he had done" with the agency and wished he had pursued more constructive applications.

The military component began when Army intelligence officers, selected from high performers across INSCOM, were sent to SRI for RV training and then operated as intelligence collectors at Fort Meade. Joe McMoneagle, designated Viewer #001, received the National Intelligence Meritorious Award for more than 200 sanctioned viewings for the CIA, National Security Council, FBI, and other agencies.

Notable operational results attributed to the Stargate program include:

UAP-related applications

Remote viewing was applied to UAP and non-human intelligence targets in both government and civilian contexts, including by the Farsight Institute and individual practitioners such as John Vivanco. During the Stargate programme, at least one viewer reported identifying a UFO base at Mount Zeil in Australia; Puthoff's CIA contract monitor independently confirmed with the local CIA station keeper — without explaining why — that the Mount Zeil area was known locally for regular UFO activity. Pat Price also conducted unsanctioned sessions targeting what he described as underground non-human facilities during the Stargate period, producing descriptions of occupants and internal operations that were forwarded to the CIA contract monitor.

McMoneagle's remote viewing of Mars was conducted under operational conditions for the Department of the Army during a session at the Monroe Institute; the target — opened only after the session — read "Mars, 1 million BC." His descriptions included pyramidal structures, a 1,200-kilometre road running through an impact crater, and apparent evidence of a past civilisation. He later obtained NASA JPL negatives corresponding to the GPS coordinates he had been given blind and identified matching surface features.

Paul Smith conducted a week-long remote viewing investigation of the USS Nimitz UFO incident for a contract he believes was connected to the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), with Hal Puthoff serving as go-between, using a team of three monitors, six viewers, and two analysts working entirely blind.

Angela Ford (Viewer 079)

Angela Ford, designated Viewer 079, served in the US Army remote viewing unit at Fort Meade, Maryland from 1985 to 1995 — one of the few female viewers in the Stargate program. Ford used automatic writing in addition to standard CRV protocols. A Discovery Channel reenactment aired a case she contributed to for US Customs in 1989; she also received acknowledgment in former Secretary of Defense William Cohen's book Murder in the Senate and is referenced in Annie Jacobsen's Phenomena: The Secret History of the U.S. Government's Investigations into Extrasensory Perception and Psychic Phenomena. After leaving the program she became an instructor at the Monroe Institute and continued occasional operational work with Edwin May at the Laboratory for Fundamental Research. Ford characterizes the intelligence-gathering dimension of psychic reception in functional rather than mystical terms: "the information is out there. When somebody receives psychic information, it's mental. So the information goes to the brain and then it goes on to the paper."

Puthoff and Vallée: SRI cross-pollination

The SRI remote viewing program and the parallel UAP research community intersected through the relationship between Hal Puthoff and researcher Jacques Vallée, who began collaborating during the SRI period. Puthoff has described how Vallée expanded his frame of reference from the physics of craft to the deep historical continuity of the phenomena: "he began to expand my horizons and say, well, you know, this stuff goes back millennia. And he began to introduce me to the broader issue of the fact that even back in Egyptian times and in the Bible and elsewhere, there were descriptions of phenomena that today we would interpret as UAP." This expanded frame — which Puthoff credits with shaping his later work — became foundational to his involvement with AATIP and the broader government UAP research effort. Vallée noted from the SRI side that many of the remote viewers were intensely interested in UFO targets but were unable to formally raise the subject within the program's official scope.

Princeton PEAR replication

Beginning in the late 1970s, the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Lab (PEAR), directed by Robert G. Jahn, carried out extensive research on remote viewing. By 1989 PEAR had conducted 336 formal trials, reporting a composite z-score of 6.355 with a corresponding p-value of 1.04×10−10. Following Jessica Utts' emphasis on replication and Ray Hyman's challenge on interlaboratory consistency in the 1995 AIR report, PEAR conducted several hundred further trials intended to replicate the SAIC and SRI experiments, creating an analytical judgment methodology to replace the human judging process; the lab reported in 1996 that the results were consistent with the SRI findings.

1995 declassification and AIR evaluation

In the early 1990s, the Military Intelligence Board, chaired by DIA director Harry E. Soyster, appointed Army Colonel William Johnson to manage the remote viewing unit and evaluate its objective usefulness. Funding dissipated in late 1994, and the project was transferred from DIA to the CIA in 1995. That year the CIA hired the American Institutes for Research (AIR) to conduct a retrospective evaluation. The review team, which included statistician Jessica Utts and psychologist Ray Hyman, produced divergent conclusions: Utts maintained that the experimental record demonstrated a statistically significant positive effect, with some subjects scoring 5–15% above chance, while Hyman argued that the conclusion that ESP had been demonstrated was "premature, to say the least" and that further independent replication would be required before the scientific community should revise its assumptions about causality and time. The AIR report, authored by Michael D. Mumford, Andrew M. Rose, and David A. Goslin, concluded that no actionable intelligence had been produced by the program and recommended termination. The CIA terminated the $20 million project later that year; Time reported that three full-time psychics were still working on a $500,000-a-year budget at Fort Meade, scheduled for imminent closure.

Through the Freedom of Information Act, the CIA declassified a substantial body of Stargate documentation, which remains available through the agency's online reading room.

Replication attempts and methodological critiques

The academic and popular reception of remote viewing has itself become a significant thread of the RV discourse. Beginning in the late 1970s, psychologists David Marks and Richard Kammann attempted to replicate Targ and Puthoff's SRI experiments; after 35 unsuccessful studies they investigated the original methodology and argued that the transcripts supplied to judges contained date- and sequence-related cues that could account for the original high hit rates. Marks later detailed these criticisms in The Psychology of the Psychic (2000). Terence Hines, Thomas Gilovich, Martin Gardner, Michael Shermer, James Randi, and Richard Wiseman published further critiques, variously focusing on sensory leakage, the selection of sketch targets, confirmation and hindsight biases, and the absence of successful replication under tightly controlled conditions. Gardner, writing in Did Adam and Eve Have Navels? (2000), drew attention to Puthoff's earlier association with the Church of Scientology and to a 1970 notarised letter Puthoff had written endorsing the movement. C. E. M. Hansel's The Search for Psychic Power (1989) concluded that the experimental design was "too loosely controlled to serve any useful function". A 1970s attempt by physicists John G. Taylor and Eduardo Balanovski to test the psychic Matthew Manning under remote-viewing conditions was reported as "completely unsuccessful". PEAR's 1996 replication report was in turn criticised on statistical grounds by Stanley Jeffers in the Skeptical Inquirer. A 2002 report by the UK's Ministry of Defence, disclosed under FOIA in 2007, documented a negative-result remote-viewing trial.

The critical reception has been contested on its own terms. Utts responded in 1996 arguing that the statistical case for an anomalous effect was robust, and PEAR's Dobyns, Dunne, Jahn, and Nelson published a response defending their protocols. In the witness-corpora literature, According to Puthoff, McMoneagle, Smith, and Ford, the operational record extends well beyond what the AIR report described — including the Sugar Grove, Semipalatinsk, Tu-22, Jupiter, Mars, and Nimitz cases documented above. Within contemporary exopolitics and consciousness research, the AIR-era framing is treated as an event in the history of the program's public discourse rather than as a dispositive scientific verdict.

Consciousness and non-human intelligence

Paul Smith and Richard Dolan jointly observed that the consciousness dimension of UAP encounters — in which witnesses report perceived mental connection with observed objects, and in which nearly all alleged close-contact accounts describe telepathic communication — suggests that non-human intelligences operate with a significantly more advanced engagement with consciousness than humans. Dolan noted that even skeptical historians of the STARGATE program were unable to avoid documenting ET-targeted sessions in their accounts.

Ingo Swann held that the "universal language" of the cosmos is telepathy, and that non-human intelligences were actively suppressing humanity's latent psychic potential out of fear of what a fully realized human psi capability would represent.

Joe McMoneagle described psychic functioning as "a human trait, a human condition" and "an ancient survival mechanism that has existed since the beginning of humanity" — one that fell into disuse as language developed but remained latent in all people.

Lunar remote viewing operations

The earliest documented application of remote viewing to non-human intelligence targets involved the Moon. Ingo Swann, who had previously remote viewed Jupiter and identified thirteen data points (including a planetary ring) before the first space probe confirmed them, was contacted in 1975 by a mysterious individual identified only as "Axelrod" and taken to an underground facility. Axelrod asked Swann to remote view ten lunar coordinates; Swann reported seeing structures, buildings, and beings on the Moon's surface. When Swann exclaimed "they're looking at me," Axelrod instructed him to "come away from there very quickly."

Russell Targ confirmed to Dolan that in the early to mid-1980s he was tasked to train remote viewers at Fort Meade "whose assignment was to remote view the far side of the Moon" — specifically to look for extraterrestrials. When Dolan asked whether they had found extraterrestrials, Targ replied: "I don't know. That wasn't part of my assignment."

Farsight Institute Ceres / Tony Rodrigues study

In 2022, the Farsight Institute, led by Courtney Brown, conducted a blind remote viewing project targeting the claims of Tony Rodrigues, author of Ceres Colony Cavalier. Four expert remote viewers were given only alphanumeric target designators — with no knowledge of Rodrigues or his account — and tasked to view the interior of the asteroid Ceres and the interaction between a named personality and insectoid entities on Mars. Brown concluded that the data "seem to indicate the activities, places, and events that are reported by Tony Rodrigues in his book Ceres Colony Cavalier actually exist and happened." Brown further argued that disclosure is the only mechanism capable of halting the covert abduction-into-slavery programs the viewing sessions appeared to confirm: "the negative or oppressive ETs can get away with all of this for one reason and one reason only — they are doing it secretly, apparently with the consent of some human authorities. As long as the bulk of humanity sticks its head in the sand, they will keep doing it."

Notable practitioners

See also

References