Leonard Stringfield
| Leonard Stringfield |
|---|
Leonard H. Stringfield (1920–1994) was an American UFO researcher and aviation accident investigator who pioneered the systematic collection and publication of UFO crash retrieval testimony, allegedly assembling over 50 distinct accounts from military witnesses over sixteen years and publishing them in a seven-volume series of status reports that Richard Dolan has called "probably more potent and powerful than any other crash retrieval information we have."
Biography
Stringfield was born in 1920 and served in the United States Army Air Forces during World War II, flying missions in the Pacific theater. During these missions, he had a personal foo fighter sighting — a close encounter with an unknown aerial object — which he later cited as the origin of his lifelong interest in the UFO phenomenon. After the war, Stringfield settled in Cincinnati, Ohio, a city in the orbit of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (Dayton, Ohio), which proved strategically significant: the proximity put him in regular contact with United States Air Force personnel who would become key sources in his crash retrieval research.
In 1954, Stringfield founded CRIFO — the Civilian Research, Interplanetary Flying Objects organization — and began publishing a newsletter called Orbit, which became one of the earliest civilian UFO intelligence bulletins in the United States. CRIFO attracted national attention: Stringfield was reportedly used as an informal cleared intelligence resource during the Korean War era, with the Air Defense Command routing certain reports to him.
In the mid-1970s, after a quieter period, Stringfield's interest in crash retrievals was reinvigorated. In 1976, he published Situation Red: The UFO Siege, a book that — unusually for the era — addressed the taboo subject of crashed UFO craft and recovered bodies at a time when mainstream ufology had retreated entirely from such claims following the discrediting of the 1950 Aztec, New Mexico crash story.
Transition to crash retrieval research
Following a speaking appearance at a local Air Force conference, Stringfield was approached by an Air Force source who offered crash retrieval testimony — marking the beginning of his intensive cultivation of military witnesses. Richard Dolan described the methodology: "He's actively cultivating many military people who've got a little bit of a snippet here, a little bit of a snippet there, and then this angle of this story here, and then this story there. So even by the late seventies, he had amassed over 50 different stories that led to UFO crash retrieval — like 50 different ones — and he just kept going from there."
Stringfield's network of sources was unusually broad. Some witnesses were direct firsthand observers of crashes, bodies, or recovered craft. Others were widows and family members of deceased personnel who reported deathbed disclosures or private statements made by husbands and fathers with military backgrounds. Dolan noted: "Sometimes it was the wife of a guy who had deceased — the wife will say, 'Yeah, my husband told me back in 1966 he did a security detail at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. He guarded nine alien bodies on one occasion.'"
Stringfield himself was described by Dolan as "very logical, rational, scientific, meticulous. Like he was extremely careful. He didn't make wild statements, considering the wild nature of his topic. He himself was extremely careful." His meticulous note-keeping, extensive memory, and careful conduct of interviews gave his reports a credibility unusual in the crash retrieval literature.
The UFO Crash/Retrievals series
Beginning in 1978, Stringfield published his crash retrieval findings in small-circulation pamphlets known as the UFO Crash/Retrievals status reports. He produced seven volumes before his death in 1994:
- UFO Crash/Retrievals: Amassing the Evidence (Status Report I, 1978)
- UFO Crash/Retrievals: The Inner Sanctum (Status Report II, 1980)
- UFO Crash/Retrievals: Retrievals of the Third Kind (Status Report III, 1982)
- UFO Crash/Retrievals: The Search Continues (Status Report IV, 1984)
- UFO Crash/Retrievals: Is the Coverup Lid Lifting? (Status Report V, 1989)
- UFO Crash/Retrievals: The Maxwell AFB Incident (Status Report VI, 1991)
- UFO Crash/Retrievals: Search for Proof in a Hall of Mirrors (Status Report VII, 1994)
The seven reports were eventually compiled in a collected edition of over 400 pages that Richard Dolan has recommended as essential reading in the UFO field: "It's massive — it's like over 400 pages, eight and a half by eleven. Very well written, detailed. It's some of the best reading in the UFO field you're ever going to find, in my opinion."
Key cases documented
Among the most significant accounts Stringfield collected:
Wright-Patterson body guard (1966) — A military guard described a security detail at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base involving nine non-human bodies. The witness stated there were reportedly 30 bodies in total housed at the base; he had personal contact with nine of them, described as approximately 4 feet tall. He also stated that mobile units were maintained at certain military bases in a constant ready state specifically to recover downed craft.
Kingman, Arizona (1953) — Stringfield included the Kingman case as Abstract 5 of Retrievals of the Third Kind, publishing the sworn affidavit of engineer Arthur Stansel (pseudonym "Fritz Werner") as investigated by Raymond Fowler. Stringfield judged the story "basically true" despite being "embellished." He also documented a corroborating account from a metallurgist he identified as "Major Daly," who in April 1953 — one month before Stansel's May date — was blindfolded and flown to a hot, sandy crash site where he examined a silvery craft 25–30 feet in diameter and concluded the metal "was not native to Earth." An unnamed Army Warrant Officer at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base described seeing five crates arrive from Arizona containing dead humanoids approximately four feet tall, packed in dry ice; he stated one humanoid had still been alive when the military arrived. A CIA employee, when asked about the Kingman retrieval, told Stringfield: "A lot of it is just story. Don't use it" — but "did not deny its occurrence."
Fort Monmouth radar specialist (1953) — A radar specialist at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, described being summoned without explanation to a military theater on the base, where a film was shown of a crashed UFO in a desert environment, including footage of the craft interior and dead non-human bodies inside a tent. Approximately two weeks later, an intelligence officer approached him privately and stated the film "was a hoax — forget it." The witness could not account for why he had been shown the film or why he had been told afterward to disregard it. Dolan speculated the man had been assessed for potential recruitment into a crash retrieval program and had failed some behavioral criterion.
"Dr. X" autopsy witness — A source Stringfield identified only as "Dr. X," described as working on the East Coast of the United States, whom Stringfield personally met, claimed to have performed an autopsy on a non-human being and described the procedure in explicit anatomical detail. Stringfield published the account in his status reports without identifying the source by name.
Composite body description
Main article:
Grey alien
Stringfield's most significant analytical contribution was his correlation of anatomical data from multiple independent medical and military sources into a composite description of the non-human beings recovered from crash sites. In Retrievals of the Third Kind, he wrote: "Data mentioned in a number of the previous abstracts have been correlated by me to establish only a general anatomical configuration of the alien beings. Needless to say, the general features of the alien are akin to Earth's Homo sapiens. That is to say, the alien has a head, torso, arms, hands and is bipedal. There, the likeness ends." The resulting fourteen-point description — covering height (3.5 to 4.5 feet), disproportionately large cranium, large deep-set eyes, vestigial nose and mouth, four-fingered hands with possible webbing, and grey or beige skin — became the foundational reference for what later researchers called the Grey alien morphotype. Stringfield submitted composite drawings of the head to a former CIA employee for verification and was told: "Use head number two. That's close enough."
Position on Roswell
Stringfield interviewed Major Jesse Marcel directly — by phone, with NBC radio newsman Steve Tom, on April 7, 1978 — about the Roswell retrieval. Marcel described recovering metal fragments "of great strength" that "could not be bent or broken, no matter what pressure was applied by hand" from a one-mile-square area on the ranch. Stringfield noted Marcel's statement that the fragments were routed through Fort Worth on General Ramey's orders for forwarding to Wright-Patterson Field. Stringfield's own assessment was that "if there were entities aboard, no evidence was found" at the debris field — concluding that any occupants "would have been destroyed in what appeared to be an aerial explosion." His comprehensive body data — the most detailed composite in the literature — derived from other crash retrieval cases, not from Roswell.
Crash retrieval protocols
Stringfield's testimony collection extended beyond body and craft sightings to the institutional infrastructure of crash retrieval operations — including the military protocols used to secure crash sites, transport materials, and store artifacts and biological remains at secure facilities. Richard Dolan noted: "Stringfield got access to many aspects of those protocols, both to recover the disk and then to store the various artifacts." These accounts of operational logistics represented one of the most detailed early maps of the crash retrieval infrastructure subsequently described by witnesses including Bob Lazar, Clifford Stone, and later by David Grusch in his 2023 congressional testimony.
Influence and legacy
Stringfield is regarded by researchers including Richard Dolan as the foundational figure in crash retrieval investigation. Dolan has characterized him as "the OG of crash retrieval research — I don't think that anyone gets higher place than that man." The relative obscurity of Stringfield's work — his seven status reports were published in small pamphlets with negligible circulation — means that much of his research remained unknown to later generations of UFO researchers and to the general public despite its content being, in Dolan's assessment, more comprehensive and detailed than most subsequently famous crash retrieval disclosures.
Aviation historian and artist Michael Schratt undertook a major project to visualize and contextualize Stringfield's cases through detailed reconstructed illustrations, making the testimony accessible to audiences who might not engage with the text-dense original reports. Dolan has described Schratt's work as "breathing life into it visually, so people can just kind of see — you need to be able to see a lot of this, not just read it."
Donald Schmitt, who credits Stringfield with coining the term "crash retrieval" at the 1978 MUFON symposium in Dayton, Ohio — directly adjacent to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base — describes Stringfield as a "magnet" who attracted military sources precisely because of the courage his early publication demonstrated: "He became a magnet because of that MUFON conference where he broke the story of crash retrieval, where he actually coined the very term crash retrieval cases at the conference in Dayton, Ohio, and how appropriate, right in the backyard of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base." Schmitt, who himself led six archaeological digs at Roswell and compiled over 600 witness interviews, placed Stringfield's witness-protection ethic in high regard: Stringfield maintained strict anonymity for all his informants until his death, and Schmitt cited this discretion as the primary reason military sources trusted him with accounts that went to grave — testimony they never disclosed to other researchers.
Stringfield died in 1994, the same year he completed his seventh and final status report. He is referenced in the research of Richard Dolan, Stanton Friedman, and numerous later researchers as a primary source for the investigation of pre-1978 crash retrieval accounts.