Flatwoods Monster

Ikwipedia

Flatwoods Monster

Folklore Humanoid, extraterrestrial
First attested September 12, 1952
Other name(s) Braxton County Monster, Braxie, Green Monster, Phantom of Flatwoods
Country United States
Region Flatwoods, West Virginia

The Flatwoods Monster — also known as the Braxton County Monster, Braxie, the Green Monster, or the Phantom of Flatwoods — is a large non-human entity reportedly encountered on September 12, 1952, in Flatwoods, Braxton County, West Virginia, by a group of local residents who had gone to investigate a bright object seen to land or crash on a nearby hill. The witnesses described a craft emitting a foul-smelling mist and a towering figure with a distinctive spade-shaped head and glowing orange eyes — an encounter that allegedly produced lasting physiological effects in several witnesses and has been connected by subsequent research to a broader wave of UAP activity during the summer of 1952. Conventional investigators, most prominently Joe Nickell of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, have argued that the bright light was a meteor and that the creature was a barn owl perched in a tree, with shadows distorting its appearance.

Event Chronology

On the evening of September 12, 1952, at approximately 7:15 p.m., three boys — brothers Edward and Freddie May and their friend Tommy Hyer — reportedly observed a bright object streak across the sky and appear to land or impact on a hill on the farm of G. Bailey Fisher on the outskirts of Flatwoods. The boys ran to the home of Kathleen May, and the group that assembled to investigate the light included:

The group proceeded to the hilltop, with Lemon carrying a flashlight. As they crested the hill they first noticed a pulsating red light — later believed to be the craft itself — to their right. They also described an intense, acrid, choking mist that hung in the air and burned their eyes and throats. Lemon's dog, which had run ahead, retreated whimpering back past the group.

As Lemon swept his flashlight beam to the left, it illuminated the entity. According to Nunley, the group saw a pulsing red light, and Lemon aimed the flashlight in that direction and momentarily saw a tall "man-like figure with a round, red face surrounded by a pointed, hood-like shape". The creature was positioned near a large oak tree, appearing to hover slightly above or just at ground level. All witnesses reacted with immediate terror; Lemon reportedly collapsed, and others in the group screamed and ran. According to the account, when the figure made a hissing sound and "glided toward the group", Lemon screamed and dropped his flashlight, causing the group to run away. The group fled back down the hill and returned to the May home, where they contacted A. Lee Stewart Jr., a reporter for the Braxton Democrat, who came to interview them within an hour and subsequently reported the account. The local sheriff and a deputy, already investigating reports of a crashed aircraft in the area, searched the site but reportedly "saw, heard and smelled nothing".

Physical Description of the Entity

Witnesses gave broadly consistent accounts of the following characteristics:

In an article for Fate Magazine based on his tape-recorded interviews, UFO writer Gray Barker described the figure as approximately 10 feet tall, with a round blood-red face, a large pointed "hood-like shape" around the face, eye-like shapes which emitted greenish-orange light, and a dark black or green body.

The entity reportedly did not approach the witnesses or make any aggressive movement beyond a single forward glide. Lemon and the others fled before the encounter extended more than a few seconds.

Description of the Craft

The pulsating red light observed on the hill was described as large — approximately 10 to 25 feet in diameter in various accounts — resting on or hovering just above the ground to the right of the entity. Kathleen May, as recounted by Holt Byrne, estimated the ball as "at least 10 feet or more in diameter" and described it as "pulsing light and making a slight hissing sound". It emitted or was surrounded by a thick, hazy mist that smelled of acrid, metallic, sulfurous material — witnesses variously described it as burning metal, gunpowder, or a skunk-like smell with a caustic quality. The object was not examined closely by any witness due to the panic of the entity encounter.

Witnesses and Physical Effects

The witnesses reportedly experienced significant physical symptoms in the hours and days following the encounter:

A. Lee Stewart Jr. returned to the site with another person on the night of September 12, after the witnesses had fled, and described the mist still present, the ground showing indentations, and an "odd metallic odor" he compared to burning sulfur. By the following morning, a ring of flattened or burned grass was reportedly visible at the site. Stewart also claimed to have discovered "skid marks" in the field and an "odd, gummy deposit", which UFO enthusiast groups subsequently attributed to a "saucer" landing.

Press Coverage and Investigation

The case attracted immediate local and regional press attention. Kathleen May and Eugene Lemon appeared on a Baltimore television program within days and the story was reported nationally. Local news editor Holt Byrne of the Beckley Post-Herald later recounted that "newspaper stories were carried throughout the country, radio broadcasts were carried on large networks, and hundreds of phone calls were received from all parts of the country" and that the national press services rated the story "No. 11 for the year". According to Byrne, a minister from Brooklyn traveled to Flatwoods to question the May family, comparing their account to a vision he had had in a dream years earlier, and a Pittsburgh daily paper sent a special reporter. UFO and Fortean writers including Gray Barker and Ivan T. Sanderson arrived to investigate.

The United States Air Force and local authorities declined to formally investigate the case. Air Force investigators, operating under Project Blue Book's rubric at the time, later suggested the entity might have been an owl perched in a tree — an explanation widely rejected by researchers and witnesses given the reported 10–12 foot height, humanoid configuration, and glowing eyes.

Conventional explanations

After investigating the case in 2000, Joe Nickell of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry concluded that the bright light in the sky reported by the witnesses on September 12 was most likely a meteor, that the pulsating red light was likely an aircraft navigation or hazard beacon, and that the creature described by witnesses closely resembled an owl. Nickell suggested that witnesses' perceptions were distorted by their heightened state of anxiety. Nickell's conclusions are shared by a number of other investigators, including those of the Air Force.

On the night of the sighting on September 12, 1952, a meteor had reportedly been observed across three states — Maryland, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. According to Nickell, three flashing red aircraft beacons were also visible from the area of the sightings, which could account for descriptions of a pulsating red light and red tint on the face of the supposed monster.

Nickell concluded that the shape, movement, and sounds reported by witnesses were also consistent with the silhouette, flight pattern, and call of a startled barn owl perched on a tree limb, suggesting that foliage beneath the owl may have created the illusion of the lower portions of the "creature" (described as being a pleated green skirt). Researchers also argued that the witnesses' inability to agree on whether the "creature" had arms, combined with May's report of it having "small, claw-like hands" which "extended in front of it", also matched the description of a barn owl with its talons gripping a tree branch.

According to skeptic Ryan Haupt, local boy Max Lockard later admitted he had driven his Chevy truck around the site "hoping to see something", and "paranormal investigators concluded that the tracks, oily residue, and bits of a rubbery substance must have been left by the creature and not the truck". Haupt explains nausea reported by some of the witnesses as a symptom "consistent with hysteria and over-exertion".

Research by Frank Feschino Jr.

Beginning in the 1990s, researcher Frank Feschino Jr. conducted extensive field investigation of the Flatwoods case, interviewing surviving witnesses and examining historical records. Feschino's central thesis, developed in his books and documented research, purportedly connects the September 12, 1952 Flatwoods encounter to a specific and documented sequence of events:

On September 12, 1952, the U.S. Air Force and USAF radar stations allegedly tracked multiple unidentified objects over the eastern United States, several of which appeared on radar returns as disabled or moving erratically. Multiple Project Blue Book records from that date reportedly show reports of objects seen to crash or descend in West Virginia, Virginia, and surrounding states. Feschino argues, from analysis of radar tracks, pilot intercept reports, and civilian sightings, that at least one and possibly several UAP were shot at or damaged in aerial encounters with Air Force interceptors on that date, and that the object that came down near Flatwoods was one of these disabled craft — the entity being a surviving occupant or a remote-controlled unit from the craft attempting to effect repairs or await recovery.

This thesis connects the Flatwoods Monster encounter to the broader context of the 1952 Washington, D.C., UFO incident — the largest mass sighting event in the modern UFO era, which had occurred just weeks earlier in July 1952 and had triggered a wave of Air Force intercept attempts nationwide.

Intelligence and Research Response

Richard Dolan documents that the Flatwoods case attracted investigators beyond the local press: UFO researchers Ivan Sanderson and Gray Barker both came to Flatwoods and interviewed witnesses, as did members of the Air Force. Sanderson, after his own on-site investigation, concluded that "a flight of intelligently controlled objects flew over West Virginia" — and even skeptics who examined the case ruled out a hoax.

Joseph P. Farrell, drawing on Feschino's research, characterizes the Flatwoods encounter as central to understanding the Air Force's 1952 "shoot down" policy. In Farrell's summary, Feschino presents case after case of Air Force intercept attempts — the service "attempting to force the UFOs to land at American military bases, or, failing that, to shoot them down" — and the Flatwoods case is explicitly identified as a direct result of that policy: a UAP encountered by civilians on the ground after being engaged and disabled, with the entity being an occupant of the craft. Feschino further argues that "some of these UFOs were clearly in the company of a mothership," which would account for the speed of any recovery effort.

Filmmaker James Fox, discussing the 1952 Washington D.C. UAP wave, relayed that Jacques Vallée was "convinced that they had orders to shoot these things down, that one of them, a piece, did fall down and it was captured" — a claim that Fox characterized as hearsay but which Vallée maintained with conviction. Fox declined to include it in his documentary but confirmed it as Vallée's privately held position based on source material. If accurate, the Flatwoods case allegedly represents one of the incidents in which a disabled UAP came down in populated territory, with the entity described by witnesses being an occupant of or remote-controlled component of the craft — consistent with Feschino's documented analysis of the September 12, 1952 radar tracks.

1952 shoot-down order

Joseph P. Farrell connected the Flatwoods encounter to President Harry Truman's 1952 shoot-down order against UFOs, noting the paradox at its core: "you've got Truman's shoot-down order in 1952. When clearly nobody had the technology to stand up to these things. So, why is it being given?" Farrell's framing suggests that the policy — whether or not it was militarily effective — was a deliberate posture of the post-war American deep state, with the Flatwoods incident allegedly representing one of its potential consequences: a disabled craft coming down in civilian territory.

Rendlesham Connection

The Flatwoods case is frequently compared with the Rendlesham Forest incident of December 1980, in which Jim Penniston, John Burroughs, and other U.S. Air Force personnel at RAF Woodbridge reportedly encountered a landed craft emitting similar effects — including apparent electromagnetic interference with radios and equipment, and physiological effects on witnesses. David Fravor, describing his own views on significant UFO cases, cited Rendlesham as a case where witnesses "got radiation burns" and one witness was medically disabled — a pattern of physical effects on close-approach witnesses that mirrors those reported at Flatwoods in 1952.

Historical Significance

The Flatwoods case is among the most widely reported close-encounter accounts of the 1950s for several reasons:

Legacy

Officials in Flatwoods erected a welcome sign designating the town as "Home of the Green Monster". Located in the town of Sutton, the Braxton County seat, is the Flatwoods Monster Museum, which is dedicated to the legend and was established in association with Frank Feschino and the local historical society. The Braxton County Convention and Visitor's Bureau also built a series of five tall chairs in the shape of the monster to serve as landmarks and visitor attractions, rewarding visitors who photograph all five with "Free Braxie" stickers. Since 2019, Flatwoods has hosted an annual Flatwoods Monster Convention.

The legend has inspired media beyond West Virginia. The video games Fallout 76 and Everybody's Golf 4 contain references to the legend. In television, the second episode of the 2019 History Channel series Project Blue Book — titled "The Flatwoods Monster" — is based on the incident.

See also

References