Page 1

STATE-OF-THE-ART IN UFO DISCLOSURE WORLDWIDE

Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos

The relationship between society and government as far as the UFO phenomenon is concerned is a very complex issue in many of the most advanced countries. Defense, intelligence agencies, police forces and the governments themselves have tackled the UFO question and the cumulative UFO archives in a variety of manners, procedures and policies, non-uniform and changing over the decades.

Through the attached template, the present paper introduces a concise chronological picture of the history of release of UFO archives at a worldwide level. In the current context, by “UFO disclosure” I mean the revelation, declassification or release of official UFO reports from governmental files to the news media, researchers, and UFO organizations or directly placed into the public domain.

This relates to both classified and non-classified records, military and non-military reports; in sum, officially-originated files pertaining to UFO sightings.

Every summary of reality distorts it in some way. In this case, the tabulation of the varied and sometimes quite complicated administrative processes involved conveys a certain distortion by necessity. In my view, the advantage of producing this compilation outweighs the necessary abridgement of data. I have attempted to consolidate all significant or major releases over time, in some instances selecting from a variety of actions over a span of 60 years, for the purpose of achieving a year-to-date status review of the national formulae followed to comply with the citizens' aspiration to have access to governmental records related to UFO information.

The intricacies of internal bureaucracies, the way UFO reports have been handled by authorities, the various air forces' relationships with the press or with ufologists, national legislation and, above all, a general ignorance about whether or not UFOs represent a threat to homeland security, have marked the different historical behaviors we observe herein.

It seems evident that in most countries the release of UFO documents is linked to lobbying by the media or UFO organizations. In other cases, it simply runs parallel to the routine declassification of government archives.

The United States of America has the most convoluted panorama by far, mainly because of the multiplicity of agencies implied, the immense volume of material generated and the large number of both characters and events involved. In the international scene, the USA took the lead in the handling of UFO reports and, somehow, most countries mirrored their own management of the UFO question according to US standards, for better or for worse.

Massive amounts of documentation have been declassified and released by both the USAF and other agencies. However, there is evidence of present

Page 2

withholding of supplementary information by some intelligence agencies, like the CIA or the NSA, in addition to the United States Air Force and NORAD. Whether documents were destroyed, lost, or simply refused for release, we do not know. Many UFO researchers in the States suspect untruthful behavior. Agencies contend that disclosure (i.e., revealing intelligence sources and methods) would endanger US intelligence capabilities, as it would jeopardize listening posts abroad, eavesdropping systems, electronic techniques, etc. Regarding NORAD, its reticence to make public its files would avoid uncovering the sheer amount of uncorrelated targets in the system. In any event, as far as documents on actual UFO occurrences, it is difficult for me to think of case information more sensational than what already exists, either declassified or in the ufologists' own files. The effect of the forthcoming law on administrative transparency by US President Barack Obama on these pending-to-declassify records may result in a major change.

As this paper shows, a remarkable amount of UFO-related information from official sources has been disclosed in many countries to date. But in spite of the large wealth of UFO documentation available worldwide, there are release processes still unfinished, and others not yet started.

The following is certain: to hide information would simply feed rumors about conspiracies and evil practices, it is a continuing source of criticism, it overshadows the image of any government, and it is unfair to its taxpayers. All this can be avoided through a crystal-clear disclosure process.

The timing of public UFO disclosures is not random. There is an escalation marked, first, by the closure of the USAF Project "Blue Book" in January 1970, the declassification of its files later this year and their final transfer to the US National Archives in 1976, followed by a similar move in Canada in 1980. Meanwhile, New Zealand started placing UFO files at the National Archives. UFO researchers succeeded in having several European governments release or declassify their UFO records (Sweden 1983, Spain 1992). In other countries, the application of current legislation on public archives produced the availability of UFO files (UK 1987). These examples encouraged UFO organizations and researchers to achieve the opening of UFO files (Portugal 1990, Italy 1996, Brazil 1999) and the international precedents produced "copycat" effects and influenced other countries (Switzerland 1994, Philippines 2000, Australia 2003, France 2007, Ireland 2007, Denmark 2009) as far as en-masse disclosure is concerned.

In addition to the lights and shadows of the declassification in the United States, Europe and Australasia stand out by the completeness and professionalism in the public disclosure processes. On the contrary, Central and South American countries have failed to advance a full-size, systematic development.

In some instances, the initial release of UFO documents to journalists created a great deal of friction with the official sources because of serious mismanagement of the information. It delayed by a number of years the possibility of a full public declassification process (e.g., in Spain and Italy).

Page 3

Considering the many precedents to date, this compiler's recommendation is that active local UFO students formally contact their air force or defense staffs to provide the following arguments:

(1) UFO phenomena represent no threat to national security; therefore it is not a military concern

(2) UFO investigation must be left exclusively to science, by methodology, approach and instrumentation

(3) To withhold information is hardly compatible with a democratic policy

(4) Many countries in the world, both large and small, have already made public their UFO records

There are specialists in Europe who have instigated and monitored national release or declassification processes, whose know-how and advice on best practices can prove useful to governments willing to proceed in this direction.

There are several targets to accomplish with the publication of this paper. Firstly, I would like to provide a compilation of historical data that illuminates a generally obscure subject. Then, I hope it will generate feedback to expand this table and improve its accuracy. Also, government officials may be inspired to commence similar release processes in their countries.

Overall, given the geographical extent and temporal amplitude of the UFO disclosure operations under various political scenarios, it demonstrates that there is a case to support it as a legitimate matter for academic research where historians, sociologists, defense or intelligence analysts, students of government administration or bureaucracy, information science specialists like librarians, archivists and documentalists, and other experts can develop Ph.D. dissertations and publish papers in professional journals. It will improve the current knowledge and will attract scholars to this field with new visions, interpretations and insights.

Though unprecedented in its global scope, this study cannot claim to be exhaustive; in fact, it is only an approximation in the case of some nations. The US picture has been particularly difficult to define because of conflicting information from multiple sources.

As a best possible summing-up of a fragmentary history pertaining to the subject matter, in doing this research I have found out that the true story of the interaction between DoDs & the intelligence community and UFO reporting (data acquisition and analysis) is yet to be written.

Acknowledgments

In its preparation phase, the attached template has received invaluable cooperation from the members of EuroUFO, the largest network of European UFO researchers. In particular from Jean-François Baure, Björn Borg, Ole-Jonny Brænne, Piotr Cielebias, Dr. Dave Clarke, Dr. Joaquim Fernandes, Patrick Ferryn, Mikhail Gershtein, Patrick Gross, Pierre Lagrange, Anders Liljegren, Ulrich Magin, Bruno Mancusi, Claude Maugé, Joe McGonagle, Matías

Page 4

Morey, Marco Orlandi, Theo Paijmans, Jean-Pierre Pharabod, Jenny Randles, Edoardo Russo, Clas Svahn, Dr. Jacques Vallee and Frits Westra.

Also, I appreciate the assistance provided by other UFO colleagues as well as national archives civil servants or military personnel: Alejandro Agostinelli, Colonel Eduardo Aguirre, Jan Aldrich, Edison Boaventura, William Chalker, Dr. Anthony Choy, Fernando Fernandes, Diane Frola, Peter A. Gersten, Ademar J. Gevaerd, Marcos González, Barry J. Greenwood, Richard Heiden, Milton Hourcade, Heriberto Janosch, Don Ledger, Kentaro Mori, Jonathan Newport, Francis Ridge, Jaime Rodríguez, Chris Rutkowski, Brad Sparks and Illobrand Von Ludwiger.

Contact the autor

Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos

Apartado de correos 12140

46080 Valencia

Spain

fotocat@anomalia.org

Page 5

Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

Page 9

Page 10

Page 11

Page 12

Page 13

Page 14

Page 15

Page 16

Page 17

Page 18

© Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos & EuroUFO, May 2009.