Alien grey extraterrestrial zeta reticuli ufo leaked footage

Ikwipedia

Alien grey extraterrestrial zeta reticuli ufo leaked footage

Template:Infobox media

Second ivan0135 video — the primary "Skinny Bob" footage. Sourced from archive.org.

"alien grey extraterrestrial zeta reticuli ufo leaked footage" is the second video uploaded to YouTube by the anonymous channel ivan0135 on 2 May 2011. It supposedly shows a living Grey-type non-human intelligent being referred to as "Skinny Bob," filmed in what appears to be a controlled indoor environment. The footage has been subjected to extensive forensic analysis by visual effects professionals, digital forensics researchers, and the r/SkinnyBob community on Reddit, and remains neither authenticated nor debunked after fifteen years.

Description

The video opens with several paragraphs of text and two still frames of the entity. Three sequences follow:

The audio throughout consists of a continuous projector-rattle sound consistent with 16mm film playback, shifting slightly at scene transitions. The audio is assessed to be a stock sound effect applied digitally, matching the other post-processing effects identified on the footage.

Additional YouTube keywords set for this video include: planet, earth, moon, exclusive, science, predator.

Post-processing effects

All analysts — whether concluding the underlying footage is authentic or synthetic — agree that the ivan0135 videos were digitally post-processed before upload.

The film damage overlay was identified by Reddit user u/BrooklynRobot as a commercially available stock video clip. The software used to apply the overlay and other aging effects was identified by u/Jazzlike_Squirrel as Sapphire Plug-ins for After Effects by Boris FX. The embedded timecode uses the Microsoft font Consolas (released 2006) with additional distortion effects, as discovered by u/BrooklynRobot. The KGB logo still frame that opens the first ivan0135 video was sourced from the debunked 1998 documentary The Secret KGB UFO Files.

The timestamp redaction — a black rectangle censoring part of the timecode — was added by Ivan, since the timecode itself was digitally embedded. The timecode does not follow temporally shifting frames, proving it was not originally embedded in the source material but added later.

Production (authenticity case)

The forensic investigation documented at skinnybob.info, drawing on the work of the r/SkinnyBob community, multiple VFX professionals, and independent analysts, describes the underlying footage as authentic recordings of a non-human being onto which Ivan applied commercially available film-aging effects before uploading to YouTube.

Biological observations

Observable features of the entity documented by frame-by-frame analysts include: blinking with what appears to be a translucent nictitating membrane, visible thoracic breathing, head and arm movements, and possible jugular vein motion. The eye-socket shape shifts from round to flat on the bottom across frames — a phenomenon VFX professionals designated "Paola" and stated could not be explained by compression artifacts. The physician's hand movements visible in the first video's autopsy scene move naturally at approximately 24 frames per second, a default recording speed of contemporary film cameras.

The skinnybob.info investigation determined that the entity's eyes do not conform to the stereotypical large dark almond-shaped "Grey" eyes. Frame analysis of the autopsy scenes revealed that the dark area around the eyes consists of shadow cast by an external object onto the face, with a straight-edge shadow boundary wrapping around the cheekbone — not a single continuously smooth covering.

Forensic scanning

A 2025 forensic review by UAP Files applied FFT analysis, motion tracking, blink detection, and AI-authenticity scanning (IMG-Detect) to the footage. Error Level Analysis found no composite artifacts. Entropy patterns matched real camera footage. IMG-Detect returned a 1% probability that the footage was AI-generated — significant given that AI video generation did not exist in 2011.

Provenance hypothesis

The footage was reportedly released through multiple "sock channels" on YouTube and other sites simultaneously, according to an email exchange between a correspondent named Will from PLANETunderATTACK and someone claiming affiliation with ivan0135, dated June 2014. The respondent stated: "We were sent that footage to release from a source," and that the "original version is not available to anyone." The respondent described an unedited 12-minute original in which "the full scene shows him sitting at a table, looking through what looks like star maps, government officials are also seen at the opposite side of the table in clothes of the time." The entity's jumpsuit was reportedly not original clothing — "original clothes were taken for analysis, human clothes were provided" — and the unedited footage showed "a dull silver type ski suit with a utility belt and dull silver footwear."

Reddit user u/Data_Pure noted that Ivan posted the first video one month after a foreign adversary launched a cyberattack on the Pentagon and stole sensitive data. The RSA breach also occurred around that time. If the footage was among the stolen files, the Pentagon itself may have released the edited clips to control the damage and narrative — publishing the material in a "lame wrapping" so that if the original footage later surfaced, a prior degraded publication would undermine its credibility.

A military intelligence contractor consulted by Jon Stewart stated that the presence of a timestamp on the footage indicated a 99% likelihood of government or government-affiliated film origin.

Stewart identified the same "owner's signature" and timestamp metadata in this footage as in the separate Gray alien interrogation video, connecting both through shared provenance markers and suggesting a common custodian releasing material through different channels.

Remote viewing

Remote viewer John Vivanco conducted a five-viewer controlled remote viewing session on this footage for Heather Wade's Midnight in the Desert program. The viewers concluded that "this was a real being" associated with a craft crash in which other beings were present. The remote viewers reported the entity repeatedly sought to return to a moist life-support container.

Production (hoax case)

The hoax hypothesis, as documented in the skinnybob.info forensic analysis and by VFX professionals, describes the footage as an elaborate multi-technique production by one or more skilled creators.

Animation and rigging

The 2025 UAP Files forensic review identified that the entity's motion behavior was "smooth, too linear, lacking natural movement variance," and that cloth movement tracked rigidly with the body "like a 3D rig" — signatures consistent with digital character animation rather than biological movement. Blink intervals fell outside normal biological ranges.

A team of five VFX professionals coordinated by Jon Stewart assessed that the underlying animation, if synthetic, was produced in Blender at an exceptionally high skill level. Stewart challenged VFX communities to replicate the entity digitally; no credible replication had been produced as of 2023.

Animatronics and puppetry

Comparing the footage to known commercial alien hoaxes and film productions, industry professionals estimated production costs ranging from five to six figures, assuming combinations of puppeteering, animatronics, costumes, computer graphics, motion tracking, and stop motion. Different scenes would have required different techniques, each adding to overall costs. VFX artist Ben Phillips estimated the total cost at approximately £220,000 with a full team.

If the skinny Bob closeup scenes used an animatronic puppet, comparable creations — such as a Todd Masters alien animatronic from the 1990s costing approximately $80,000, or Disney's "Shaman of Songs" at $10,000,000 — place the production squarely in the six-digit budget category for those two scenes alone.

Perspective anomaly

The full-body scan scene presents a perspective problem: a vertical camera pan should introduce either perspective distortion (if pivoting) or parallax (if translating vertically), but the footage exhibits neither. Experimental recreation by u/RedDwarfBee using a physical mockup demonstrated that parallax can be suppressed if the camera is far from the subject and the subject is close to the wall, and that distortion from pivoting is reduced at distance. A different theory holds that the entity was filmed as a whole and the scanning motion generated by analog or digital post-processing.

Replication attempts

Reddit user u/Shtudi successfully recreated the tin bird UFO scene from the first ivan0135 video using the same BorisFX effects, demonstrating that at least the UFO footage can be replicated with commercially available tools. No comparable replication of the entity footage has been produced.

Channel and upload history

"Tape 06 — Family Vacation", the fourth and final ivan0135 video (17 May 2011). Sourced from archive.org.

The ivan0135 channel was created on 13 April 2011. According to the channel description, the creator is from Russia and was born in 1969. Four videos were uploaded over five weeks:

# Date (UTC) Title Content
1 14 April 2011 Disclosure leaked ufo alien case video confidential documents old footage KGB logo, house with hovering UFO, aerial UFO footage, standing entity, crash site, autopsy
2 2 May 2011 alien grey extraterrestrial zeta reticuli ufo leaked footage Text introduction, side-view of seated entity, full-body scan, closing pool/shadow sequence
3 9 May 2011 Ivan0135 about ALIEN and UFO documents Text response to criticism, four-fingered handprint background
4 18 May 2011 alien grey extraterrestrial zeta reticuli tape 06 — family vacation Text about diplomatic visits under "treaty 23/04," color footage of multiple entities walking alongside humans

The channel used no monetisation, gave no interviews, posted no comments, and left no identifying information. No subsequent account matching ivan0135's upload style or content has been identified.

All videos share common YouTube keywords: ufo, crash accident, alien, extraterrestrial, life, et, zeta, reticuli, grey, desclassified, top, secret, cosmic, sighting, leaked, disclosure, confidential, autopsy, intelligence, service, rosswel, incident, new, mexico, South, Africa, Kalahari, Desert, army, navy, air, force, defense, agency, department, abduction, old, footage, 1947, space, aliens, flying, military, video, airplanes, interview. The misspelling of "Roswell" as "rosswel" and "declassified" as "desclassified" was noted — the latter being consistent with Spanish or Portuguese ("desclasificado"/"desclassificado"), potentially indicating a non-English native speaker.

According to the first video's description, the uploaded clips are "sample edited fragments" from seven tapes with a total recorded duration of 1,260 minutes, covering the period 1942–1969. Ivan provided detailed tape numbers and timestamps for each extracted clip.

References