26457815-20060474F-002-004-2023.pdf

U.S. National Archives UAP Records

Page 1

FOIA MARKER

This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the Clinton Presidential Library Staff.

Original OA/ID Number: 614
Document ID: 9508357
Stack: VRow: 44Section: 6Shelf: 4Position: 3

Page 2

DOCUMENT NO. AND TYPESUBJECT/TITLEDATERESTRICTION
001. letterSteven M. Greer to President Clinton, [re: request to meet with officials concerning release of information.] [partial] (1 page)10/19/95P6/b(6)
COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records NSC Records Management ((Flying Saucer or UFO)) OA/Box Number: 614
FOLDER TITLE: 95083572006-0474-F eh117
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President and his advisors, or between such advisors [(a)(5) of the PRA]b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift.b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 2201(3).b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
RR. Document will be reviewed upon request.

Page 3

UNCLASSIFIED NSC/RMO PROFILE

RECORD ID: 9508357

TO: PRESIDENT

RECEIVED: 15 NOV 95 14

FROM: GREER, STEVEN M

DOC DATE: 19 OCT 95

SOURCE REF:

KEYWORDS: SPACE PROGRAMS

MP

INTELLIGENCES

PERSONS:

SUBJECT: LTR TO PRES FM GREER REQUESTS MTG W/ ADMIN STAFF RE UFO SIGHTINGS & EXTRATERRESTRIALS

ACTION: NFAR PER BEERS

DUE DATE: 18 NOV 95 STATUS: C

STAFF OFFICER: BEERS

LOGREF: 9506127

FILES: WH

NSCP:

CODES:

D O C U M E N T D I S T R I B U T I O N

FOR ACTION

FOR CONCURRENCE

FOR INFO

COMMENTS:

DISPATCHED BY

DATE

BY HAND W/ATTCH

OPENED BY: NSKDB

CLOSED BY: NSASK

DOC 1 OF 1

UNCLASSIFIED


Page 4

DOC ACTION OFFICER

001 BEERS

CAO ASSIGNED ACTION REQUIRED

001

Z 95111515 ANY ACTION NECESSARY

X 96020709 NFAR PER BEERS


Page 5

UNCLASSIFIED NSC/RMO PROFILE

RECORD ID: 9508357

TO: PRESIDENT

RECEIVED: 15 NOV 95 14

FROM: GREER, STEVEN M

DOC DATE: 19 OCT 95

SOURCE REF:

KEYWORDS: SPACE PROGRAMS MP

INTELLIIGENCE

PERSONS:

SUBJECT: LTR TO PRES FM GREER REQUESTS MTG W/ ADMIN STAFF RE UFO SIGHTINGS & EXTRATERRESTRIALS

ACTION: ANY ACTION NECESSARY

DUE DATE: 18 NOV 95 STATUS: S

STAFF OFFICER: BEERS

LOGREF: 9506127

FILLES: WH

NSCP:

CODES:

D O C U M E N T D I S T R I B U T I O N

FOR ACTION BEERS

FOR INFO

BELL

SEATON

COMMENTS: No action required/my

DISPATCHED BY ___ DATE ___ BY HAND W/ATTCH

CLOSED BY:

OPENED BY: NSKDB

DOC 1 OF 1

UNCLASSIFIED


Page 6

AA2

GREER'S PREVIOUS

LETTER WAS FORWARDED TO

YOU SO I THOUGHT YOU

MIGHT WANT THIS, THIS

NEW LETTER HAS NOT RECI'D

A RESPONSE FROM US.

SETH MASKET

PRESIDENTIAL LETTERS

×6-5514

act. to sell

wanted.

Return to Deth

Market

COPY also

Sent to Cabinet

Affairs.

Thurby

195½


Page 7

Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet Clinton Library
DOCUMENT NO. AND TYPESUBJECT/TITLEDATERESTRICTION
001. letterSteven M. Greer to President Clinton, [re: request to meet with officials concerning release of information.] [partial] (1 page)10/19/95P6/b(6)
COLLECTION: Clinton Presidential Records NSC Records Management (Flying Saucer or UFO) OA/Box Number: 614
FOLDER TITLE: 95083572006-0474-F eh117
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President and his advisors, or between such advisors [(a)(5) of the PRA]b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift.b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 2201(3).b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
RR. Document will be reviewed upon request.

Page 8

C S E T I Steven M. Greer M.D. International Director

19 October 1995

NUV

2024

1000

Dear President Clinton,

Thank you for your letter of August 3, 1995, written by Mr. James Dorskind on your behalf, and for your consideration of our request to meet with relevant members of the Administration on the UFO/ETI subject.

We feel that the time has come to permit a number of our witnesses to speak openly about their involvement with U.S. government military and intelligence operations dealing with extraterrestrial spacecraft and related matters. Our witness pool continues to grow, and we would like to meet with relevant members of the Administration as soon as possible to discuss protection for these witnesses.

It is our opinion that it is in the best interests of the Administration, and of the American people, to have these witnesses disclose their information in the context of a cooperative effort with the government. At a minimum, these heroic witnesses deserve protection from prosecution for violating national security oaths, and need specific protection from all civil and military prosecution. A few of them need physical protection, since some of them sense that they and/or their families may be in real physical danger.

I am enclosing a briefing on the national security implications of the UFO/ETI subject, which is being distributed to certain figures in the US and abroad who are connected to national and international security concerns. It is intended to be a brief summary of national security implications for the President, the National Security Advisor and other relevant members of the US national security apparatus.

Please let us know how we may proceed with a meeting with members of your Administration on this important and pressing issue.

Respectfully,

Steven M. Greer M.D.

Director of CSETI

P.S: I recently read part of an interview you gave on your childhood - we have amazing parallels in our early lives, yours in Arkansas and mine in North Carolina!


Page 9

National Security Implications of the UFO/ETI Subject: A Brief Summary

National Security Implications of the UFO/ETI subject are profound and far-reaching, albeit currently largely unrecognized.

These implications may be considered in separate but related aspects: those intrinsic to ET activity and those arising from current covert management of the issue.

Historical Background

Early National Security considerations dealt with concern over public panic arising from the detection of near earth and earth-landed extraterrestrial spacecraft (ETS) and from the technological implications of advanced Extraterrestrial material as it may impact the arms race and cold war. Additional concerns were related to the impact on religious belief systems, the political order and economic systems.

Importantly, once actual ETS were retrieved in 1947, thereby allowing Extraterrestrial hardware to be studied and back-engineered for possible human military applications, the need for complete secrecy regarding the matter was deemed paramount by authorities at that time. Given the tensions of the early atomic era and the mounting 'cold war' with the USSR, it is understandable that the introduction of Extraterrestrial technology was thought to be destabilizing to an already dangerous situation. Moreover, given the history of technological secrets related to atomic and hydrogen weapons being stolen by agents of the USSR, there was understandable concern that any technological breakthrough related to Extraterrestrial technology might find its way into Soviet hands. If such an event enabled the USSR to produce actual military applications before the US, obviously this would have placed the US military capability in a potentially catastrophic disadvantage.

Since the 1970's, we have reason to believe that a degree of cooperation on this matter has evolved with the USSR and the US and perhaps other nations. Certainly the end of the cold war has largely removed earlier concerns vis a vis technological breakthroughs and the fear of Soviet aggression.

Moreover, the psychological reasons for secrecy related to public panic are not valid today. At least 57% of the population accept that UFOs are real and are of Extraterrestrial origin. And 30-40 years of space exploration by human society has prepared the population for the possible existence of other Extraterrestrial civilizations capable of space travel. In short, the previous concerns motivating secrecy are not relevant today.

Intrinsically, there is no reason to believe that the Extraterrestrial presence poses a threat to the national or world security. If hostility and aggression were related to their purpose here, it is likely that events congruent with hostility would have transpired long before now. It is our assessment that the Extraterrestrials are not hostile, but are very concerned with human capability related to warfare and the militarization of space. Activity by Extraterrestrial assets related to


Page 10

the neutralization of ICBM facilities and to containing military oriented space exploration should be understood in light of their concern over a known history of human aggression which has been coupled with the advent of weapons of mass destruction and space exploration. Indeed, given the past history of human military assets focusing on and pursuing Extraterrestrial Spacecraft, we believe the Extraterrestrials have responded with remarkable restraint.

Ironically, the threat to national security exists not with the Extraterrestrial presence, but the current covert management of the subject. In the absence of Extraterrestrial hostility over 50 years, current secrecy cannot be justified on the basis of fear of Extraterrestrial aggression. A disclosure related to the Extraterrestrial presence, if calmly and rationally presented, will not cause public panic in the US or elsewhere. 1995 is not 1945, and world society has evolved to the point where this information can be assimilated in a positive fashion.

In contrast, the covert and apparently extra-constitutional management of this matter is a real threat to national and world security, and undermines constitutional freedom and democracy. Unless it is terminated, this covert management will greatly harm US national security and the chances of a lasting world peace.

It is our assessment that the current covert management of this issue involves the following elements which are a direct, immediate and ongoing threat to the national security:

  1. The continued denial of the Extraterrestrial presence creates a situation where a sudden, undeniable, public Extraterrestrial event could induce panic, since proactive disclosure efforts which could ameliorate public fears are non-existent. It is likely that such a public Extraterrestrial event will transpire within the next 2-10 years or sooner. Therefore secrecy and denial are a real threat to national and world security.

  2. The current covert management of this issue appears to be operating independently and outside of the constitutional chain of command. The group controlling these operations, which involve reconnaissance, Extraterrestrial technology back-engineering, and space-based targeting of ETS (among others) is non-responsive to congressional or Executive branch oversight and control. This constitutes a real and grave threat to the national security and to constitutional democracy and freedom.

  3. We have credible, first hand sources who insist that extraterrestrial spacecraft have been targeted by human covert space weapons and on at least two occasions have been destroyed. If true, the risks to world peace and security are real and imminent, and the continuation of these covert activities constitute the gravest dangers to national and world security. Hostile actions taken by human covert assets against Extraterrestrial assets constitute a grave and immediate threat to the national security. A relatively small, covert entity, acting without consultation with the United Nations, the Congress, the President of the United States or the public is engaging in actions on behalf of all humans which endanger the earth and world peace. Unless controlled, these actions could precipitate interplanetary conflict and a disaster for the world generally and the United States specifically. This covert management must be terminated and control of this issue returned to constitutional authority and to the public domain.


Page 11

  1. The concentration of the technological advances related to the back-engineering of Extraterrestrial technology into the hands of a small covert operation constitutes a grave and immediate threat to the national security, to world security and to the future of the earth. These Extraterrestrial technologies, which have been the object of covert research and development for over 45 years, are potentially of great benefit to humanity if used wisely for peaceful purposes, but are of immense danger when concentrated into a small covert operation which is unresponsive to the public or the legal and constitutional chain of command. The threat this poses to the US and world security is great, and the longer this situation continues, the greater the concentration of advanced technological power in the hands of a relative few. The secret control of such powerful technologies is inherently a threat to freedom, democracy and to our nation and the world. Its utilization for covert agendas outside constitutional control represents a grave danger to our country and must be restrained and reversed.

  2. Importantly, secrecy and covert operatives per se constitute a real threat to the national security, since national security in a constitutional democracy can only be legitimately related to freedom and democratic government. Only in very rare and well-justified circumstances can extreme secrecy and covert operations exist, since by nature freedom and democracy cannot co-exist with unrestrained secrecy and secret power. The profound implications of the detection of Extraterrestrial civilizations cannot be allowed to be the exclusive domain of covert operations which are unrelated to public discourse and consultation. To do so is to undermine the US Constitution, democracy and freedom, and this constitutes a real and grave threat to the national security.

  3. Finally, exclusive covert control of this matter has resulted and continues to result in the loss of opportunity for the world to come to terms with the Extraterrestrial presence in a peaceful and mutually beneficial fashion. This means that the people of the world, the United Nations and other international and national institutions are deprived of the opportunity to deal rationally with this issue. National and world security are therefore negatively impacted by the loss of opportunities in the following areas:

The Environment, which is seriously at risk for large scale collapse over the next 100 years, would be profoundly improved if extraterrestrial technologies could be peacefully deployed. So-called zero point or free energy systems, which are non-polluting, would permit a sustainable technological civilization to exist on earth and would transform the earth environmentally and economically. Establishing peaceful and mutually beneficial relations with extraterrestrial civilizations would eventually permit us to understand and apply such technologies.

World unity and peace will be enhanced by the global realization that we are not alone in the universe. The acknowledgement of this fact will enhance the awareness that we are really one people living on the shared homeland of earth, and many of the conflicts currently afflicting the earth will be seen in a new perspective. This can be achieved without either deifying or demonizing the extraterrestrial presence, but rather placing it in a fair, scientific and neutral light. Eventually, world peace and a significant enhancement in the current geopolitical situation may result from the disclosure that we are not alone. An international infrastructure, and institutions capable of dealing peacefully with relations with extraterrestrial civilizations would, of necessity,


Page 12

evolve, and this in turn would strengthen world unity and cooperation.

World culture, ideas, science and many other diverse areas may benefit through the development of peaceful relations with other worlds. While this process may take decades, if not centuries, its delay only puts off the time when the people of the earth will be united not only globally, but with other planetary civilizations as well.

In summary, it is imperative to the national security that the president and Congress undertake measures to terminate the secret, covert management of the UFO/ETI subject. Failure to place this matter in open, public discourse and control constitutes the gravest failure of democracy and government in the history of the world. That we do this is the test of our faith in democracy and our faith in the people. As the 21st century approaches, we must roll up the cancerous excesses of secrecy which are the legacy of the cold war and unfurl a new era wherein democracy is reaffirmed and a lasting world peace is given a chance.

Steven M. Greer, MD

International Director of CSETI

30 August 1995

END BRIEFING

Images

Document image

Document image