Abduction of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370

This article is about the alleged abduction operation. For the conspiracy theory itself, see

MH370 UFO hypothesis

. For other theories, see

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappearance theories

The abduction of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 refers to the alleged clandestine U.S. military operation that, among other things and for unknown reasons, used highly classified and extremely technologically advanced orbs to supposedly create a portal to warp-transit Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 and redirect it to an undisclosed location, theorized to be Diego Garcia. The operation — and, according to some[who?], the routine and dominating use by the U.S. military-associated organizations of technology publicly understood to be impossible — were supposedly exposed by the leaking of the the supposed “MH370” military surveillance videos (the drone video and the satellite stereo video) weeks after the event. The hypothesis that this supposed event happened gained popular attention in 2023 and has been advanced by self-described citizen–journalist and researcher Ashton Forbes, who has also argued that a body of corroborating radar, satellite, and eyewitness data support it. Official aviation authorities have never publicly mentioned any abduction by UFOs or teleportation as part of a serious theory for what happened and have concluded that the aircraft crashed in the southern Indian Ocean.

The flight and its disappearance

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, a Boeing 777, departed Kuala Lumpur International Airport on 7 March 2014 (UTC) carrying 239 passengers and crew, bound for Beijing. Among the passengers were 20 employees of Freescale Semiconductor, a microchip company with defence-sector contracts, including 12 Malaysian and 8 Chinese engineers travelling to a Freescale facility under construction near Beijing.

Approximately 40 minutes into the flight, over the South China Sea, the aircraft's transponder was disabled and ACARS contact was severed, causing the aircraft to disappear from civilian radar. Malaysian military radar subsequently tracked the aircraft as it reversed course and flew back westward across the Malay Peninsula, passing close to Penang, continuing northwest through the Strait of Malacca and toward the Andaman Sea. The radar track placed the aircraft on a heading that, if extended, terminated near the Nicobar Islands — a trajectory consistent with the coordinates embedded in the leaked surveillance footage.

The capture event

Catherine T.'s eyewitness account

Main article:

Catherine T. (MH370 eyewitness)

Catherine T., a British eyewitness, was aboard a vessel in the Nicobar Islands area during the early morning hours of 8 March 2014, reported seeing a large low-flying aircraft with an orange glow and dark trailing smoke pass nearby before vanishing from sight. She initially described the object as resembling a missile, then identified it as a large passenger aircraft — flying low enough to be visually identifiable — before it disappeared. Forbes interprets the orange halo as the optical signature of the plasma field generated around the aircraft during the transit event.

The three orbs

The leaked surveillance footage, identified by Forbes as Gorgon Stare wide-area motion imagery from MQ-9 Reaper drones stationed near the Nicobar Islands, shows the aircraft at low altitude being approached and surrounded by three luminous spherical objects in a triangular formation. Forbes identifies these objects as magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) drones — plasma-field-generating craft operating on principles of quantum entanglement — rather than alien craft. Two videos capture the event from distinct angles — one taken from a drone above the aircraft, one from a drone positioned laterally — both equipped with LITENING G4 targeting pods manufactured by Northrop Grumman.

The wormhole transit

As the three orbs converged around the aircraft in the footage, a flash event occurred and the aircraft — along with the orbs — vanished simultaneously from the frame. Forbes describes the mechanism as a wormhole generated by the combined magnetohydrodynamic fields of the three orbs, consistent with theoretical work by physicist John G. Cramer on retro-causal EPR experiments. In this model, the aircraft was displaced into a state Forbes calls "counter space" or "true vacuum" — outside normal spacetime — and re-emerged at a location governed by a fourth entangled orb acting as the receiver anchor.

Proposed destination

Diego Garcia

Multiple researchers and whistleblowers have identified Diego Garcia — the major U.S. military installation in the British Indian Ocean Territory — as the aircraft's destination. Kerry Cassidy, citing an insider source in her book Rebel Gene, stated that the aircraft was redirected to Diego Garcia using the verified Boeing autopilot system, as corroborated by the investigator team Abel Danger. Forbes additionally notes that approximately 15 witnesses on a small island near the Maldives reported seeing a large aircraft flying low toward Diego Garcia in the early morning hours of 8 March 2014.

Passenger remains at Diego Garcia

Mark Domizio, a Navy secret space program (SSP) survivor who recalls participating in black projects at Diego Garcia, testified that he recovered a memory — attributed to his soul-split clone designated Hans (serial number 085971) — of the bodies of MH370 passengers being moved through freight elevators into the deep underground military base (DUMB) tunnels beneath the island. In the memory, some passengers were first allowed to exit the aircraft via the emergency slide before being killed; their remains were then transported by vehicle and deposited in designated tunnel sections under Hans's direction. Domizio recovered these memories through QHHT regression sessions.

The Indian Ocean search

The governments of Malaysia and Australia concluded, on the basis of Inmarsat satellite handshake data, that the aircraft flew south into the Indian Ocean and crashed somewhere along the so-called "seventh arc." Despite the most expensive ocean-floor search in aviation history, coordinated by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau and later by private contractor Ocean Infinity, no primary wreckage was recovered. Forbes argues the search found nothing because there is nothing to find — the aircraft was not in the Indian Ocean — and predicts that any future debris discoveries will be planted artifacts rather than in-situ crash evidence.

Operation motive

Main article:

Proposed motives for the abduction of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370

Forbes attributes the operation to the CIA, acting to prevent the transfer of advanced semiconductor or gallium nitride chip technology to China via the 20 Freescale Semiconductor engineers aboard. He speculates that whoever controlled the technology aboard — or the intellectual property the engineers carried in their heads — determined the outcome of a shadow war between the United States and China over next-generation military applications.

An intercepted communication reported by the China Times the day after the disappearance described contact between the U.S. Navy and the MH370 pilot at 02:43 Malaysian time — converting to 18:43 UTC, the moment the aircraft would have been over the Nicobar Islands — in which the pilot reported the plane was "disintegrating" during an emergency landing attempt. A Russian GRU report separately named the U.S. Navy as responsible for the aircraft's disappearance.

Passenger fate

Domizio's testimony suggests the passengers were killed after deplaning at Diego Garcia and their bodies deposited in the DUMB tunnels below the facility. An alternative account, conveyed via Kerry Cassidy, holds that "unnecessary" passengers were brain-wiped and released in third-world countries where they wandered homeless with amnesia. Forbes, in his own analysis, suggested that some passengers — particularly non-Chinese, non-Freescale travellers such as American passenger Philip Wood — may have been placed in CIA black sites or witness protection arrangements. Nineteen family members signed a joint statement reporting that their relatives' mobile phones continued to ring after the official disappearance, which Forbes argues is inconsistent with a crash at sea.

Mainstream investigation findings

The mainstream-investigation conclusion of the Malaysian Ministry of Transport (Annex 13 Safety Investigation Team for MH370), in coordination with the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) and the aircraft manufacturer, holds that Flight MH370 most likely entered the southern Indian Ocean and crashed along the so-called "seventh arc" derived from Inmarsat BTO/BFO satellite handshake data, although the investigation was unable to determine the cause of the deviation or the location of the wreckage. Subsequent confirmed debris finds — a flaperon recovered on Réunion in July 2015 (positively identified by the French BEA), additional pieces recovered along the African and Indian Ocean coasts in 2015–2016, and barnacle and drift-modeling analyses — are interpreted by mainstream investigators as confirming that the aircraft entered the Indian Ocean. Aviation safety researchers and accident investigators broadly agree that the available radar, satellite, and oceanographic data are not consistent with redirection to Diego Garcia or with any operational teleportation event. The leaked satellite/drone footage cited in the teleportation hypothesis has been examined by visual-effects analysts and by the National Geographic documentary unit, and most independent reviews — including a forensic analysis by The Sun (UK) and the Metabunk community — conclude the videos are consistent with reused stock footage and inserted Adobe After Effects particle elements rather than authentic surveillance material. No physical, instrumental, or documentary evidence corroborates the wormhole-transit account, and no peer-reviewed publication has supported a non-conventional cause.

References

Source ratings:

(Color-coding) (

[1 Wikipedia-grade]

[2 Questionable]

[3 Reporting/Analysis]

[4 Speculative/Hearsay]

[5 Ungrounded]

). (To change source ratings,

edit this page

Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "?", but no corresponding <references group="?"/> tag was found